<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Content Management Systems for a Community Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website</link>
	<description>a blog about the connected age</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>michael bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Argh, I should have checked back sooner.

Anne, I am still not sure what you mean. Certainly, there is a lot of demand for PHP developers of various sorts, but there is an even larger supply, and a heck of a lot of very bad PHP code that they are cut-and-paste-ing together to create sites.

Standing out from a very large crowd is that much more difficult, and the ceiling for your rates is correspondingly lower.

Now, far be it from me to advocate choosing a system solely because of it's small marketshare, but I do think that tools should be chosen by balancing the following considerations:

* overall marketshare

* the ratio of demand to supply (this is hard to estimate, but a good proxy is the average salary for people with that skill)

* productivity

* the degree to which a tool/platform/language will be applicable to future markets or problem domains

Of these, I consider overall marketshare to be the least important crtiteria.

You already know what primary set of tools I've chosen based on those criteria, so I won't belabor the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh, I should have checked back sooner.</p>
<p>Anne, I am still not sure what you mean. Certainly, there is a lot of demand for PHP developers of various sorts, but there is an even larger supply, and a heck of a lot of very bad PHP code that they are cut-and-paste-ing together to create sites.</p>
<p>Standing out from a very large crowd is that much more difficult, and the ceiling for your rates is correspondingly lower.</p>
<p>Now, far be it from me to advocate choosing a system solely because of it&#8217;s small marketshare, but I do think that tools should be chosen by balancing the following considerations:</p>
<p>* overall marketshare</p>
<p>* the ratio of demand to supply (this is hard to estimate, but a good proxy is the average salary for people with that skill)</p>
<p>* productivity</p>
<p>* the degree to which a tool/platform/language will be applicable to future markets or problem domains</p>
<p>Of these, I consider overall marketshare to be the least important crtiteria.</p>
<p>You already know what primary set of tools I&#8217;ve chosen based on those criteria, so I won&#8217;t belabor the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-349</guid>
		<description>michael: marketable as in making my professional self more marketable.

rick: thanks for the suggestions and info. I'm not familiar with Expression Engine or pMachine; will check those out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael: marketable as in making my professional self more marketable.</p>
<p>rick: thanks for the suggestions and info. I&#8217;m not familiar with Expression Engine or pMachine; will check those out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>michael bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 18:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Anne, can you define 'marketable' in this context?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne, can you define &#8216;marketable&#8217; in this context?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>rick gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 02:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Anne,

Textpattern is interesting. One of the easiest blog/light CMS tools with which to build a site in that it supports the concept of sections natively (no odd workarounds needed).

Also check out Expression Engine (at pmachine.com). I've built sites with its predecessor, the eponymous pMachine. EE is more powerful and seems like a very nice choice for certain uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne,</p>
<p>Textpattern is interesting. One of the easiest blog/light CMS tools with which to build a site in that it supports the concept of sections natively (no odd workarounds needed).</p>
<p>Also check out Expression Engine (at pmachine.com). I&#8217;ve built sites with its predecessor, the eponymous pMachine. EE is more powerful and seems like a very nice choice for certain uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Because it's the most marketable of the dynamic scripting languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it&#8217;s the most marketable of the dynamic scripting languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>michael bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Why the PHP requirement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the PHP requirement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 12:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve, I'll definitely check that out. I hadn't heard of TextPattern. I'm going to look into it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve, I&#8217;ll definitely check that out. I hadn&#8217;t heard of TextPattern. I&#8217;m going to look into it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen ogrady</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen ogrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 05:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/05/open-source-content-management-systems-for-a-community-website#comment-343</guid>
		<description>anne: would also recommend checking out some of the comments in Matt Raible's three part open source CMS evaluation, the last of which is here:

http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?entry=open_source_cms_evalation_part

also curious as to whether or not you've checked out TextPattern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anne: would also recommend checking out some of the comments in Matt Raible&#8217;s three part open source CMS evaluation, the last of which is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?entry=open_source_cms_evalation_part" rel="nofollow">http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?entry=open_source_cms_evalation_part</a></p>
<p>also curious as to whether or not you&#8217;ve checked out TextPattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
