<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unsatisfying Read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read</link>
	<description>a blog about the connected age</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shirazi</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-434</guid>
		<description>But it is very satisfying post; honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it is very satisfying post; honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Sierra</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Anne: thanks so much for this post (and the related ones you linked to)! I know I'm late to the party here (I've been travelling), but this post comes at a great time for me while struggling with my own book. With my previous tech books, they were start-to-finish learning books, basically replicating a course, and some were certification study guides where there just IS a specific set of topics--with a specific level of detail--and no way out of that. But now, for the first time, I find myself writing on a subject that's wide open, no constraints, and I'm overwhelmed by the choices I have to make in everything from overall length to chapter length to level of detail to number of topics and on and on.

Your post has helped me make some of these decisions.

On the related topic you brought up about Serial Enthusiast, this is an interesting one I'd like to explore more. The last two years of my life have been spent studying/analyzing the things people are passionate about, and in my talks I always ask the audience to tell the people sitting near them one thing they're passionate about. Aftwards, I always get a lot of people telling me how their passions have changed, and for many--how *frequently* they've changed.

You defined some good reasons for this... I could not agree more about the moving thing. By design, I have refused to live anywhere longer than 5 or 6 years. After that, I find myself becoming too comfortable, and I'm somewhat addicted to the thrill of starting from scratch in a completely new place, where everything from finding the best latte to picking a car mechanic is an adventure.

One reason why people lose/change passions is because they simply ran out of new challenges for that [whatever it is] OR because the amount of effort required to meet the next challenge would be too great, or not worth it. For so many things, the passion and expertise curve is almost exponential... take chess or rock climbing, for example--where each new "level" requires a near-doubling of the effort it took to reach the previous level. For a lot of things people are passionate about, there is novelty in attaining the next "level", but once you hit the real (or motivational) wall to progress further, and you're not really going anywhere else with it, then it's time for a change.

I guess it mostly comes down to how much we value having the next level of expertise in this thing (if there even IS one), and whether it's worth it (and a lot depends on our own ability to be patient). If not, then the novelty (dopamine) ceases for that thing.

Oops sorry to have left this long-ass comment--especially when part of your post was about honing things down... : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne: thanks so much for this post (and the related ones you linked to)! I know I&#8217;m late to the party here (I&#8217;ve been travelling), but this post comes at a great time for me while struggling with my own book. With my previous tech books, they were start-to-finish learning books, basically replicating a course, and some were certification study guides where there just IS a specific set of topics&#8211;with a specific level of detail&#8211;and no way out of that. But now, for the first time, I find myself writing on a subject that&#8217;s wide open, no constraints, and I&#8217;m overwhelmed by the choices I have to make in everything from overall length to chapter length to level of detail to number of topics and on and on.</p>
<p>Your post has helped me make some of these decisions.</p>
<p>On the related topic you brought up about Serial Enthusiast, this is an interesting one I&#8217;d like to explore more. The last two years of my life have been spent studying/analyzing the things people are passionate about, and in my talks I always ask the audience to tell the people sitting near them one thing they&#8217;re passionate about. Aftwards, I always get a lot of people telling me how their passions have changed, and for many&#8211;how *frequently* they&#8217;ve changed.</p>
<p>You defined some good reasons for this&#8230; I could not agree more about the moving thing. By design, I have refused to live anywhere longer than 5 or 6 years. After that, I find myself becoming too comfortable, and I&#8217;m somewhat addicted to the thrill of starting from scratch in a completely new place, where everything from finding the best latte to picking a car mechanic is an adventure.</p>
<p>One reason why people lose/change passions is because they simply ran out of new challenges for that [whatever it is] OR because the amount of effort required to meet the next challenge would be too great, or not worth it. For so many things, the passion and expertise curve is almost exponential&#8230; take chess or rock climbing, for example&#8211;where each new &#8220;level&#8221; requires a near-doubling of the effort it took to reach the previous level. For a lot of things people are passionate about, there is novelty in attaining the next &#8220;level&#8221;, but once you hit the real (or motivational) wall to progress further, and you&#8217;re not really going anywhere else with it, then it&#8217;s time for a change.</p>
<p>I guess it mostly comes down to how much we value having the next level of expertise in this thing (if there even IS one), and whether it&#8217;s worth it (and a lot depends on our own ability to be patient). If not, then the novelty (dopamine) ceases for that thing.</p>
<p>Oops sorry to have left this long-ass comment&#8211;especially when part of your post was about honing things down&#8230; : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Basu - I read Future Shock a long time ago; maybe I should look at it again. Coincidentally, I just read another Toffler book, Revolutionary Wealth. That was good, but again, too long for my tastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basu - I read Future Shock a long time ago; maybe I should look at it again. Coincidentally, I just read another Toffler book, Revolutionary Wealth. That was good, but again, too long for my tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basu</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Basu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 04:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Have you read the book Future Shock? It's a few decades old, but is still very relevant today and says a lot about the need for novelty and the growing transience of our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read the book Future Shock? It&#8217;s a few decades old, but is still very relevant today and says a lot about the need for novelty and the growing transience of our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Les - yeah, the timeliness thing... we are all still looking forward to your delicious book. I have yet to purchase a booklet of the sort I'm describing for download but I think I would be willing to do so, if it were the right topic and author. From an author's point of view, it could be more satisfying to move quickly through a subject, treat it in the amount of time needed, and move on to the next.

Congratulations on your wedding and have a great honeymoon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Les - yeah, the timeliness thing&#8230; we are all still looking forward to your delicious book. I have yet to purchase a booklet of the sort I&#8217;m describing for download but I think I would be willing to do so, if it were the right topic and author. From an author&#8217;s point of view, it could be more satisfying to move quickly through a subject, treat it in the amount of time needed, and move on to the next.</p>
<p>Congratulations on your wedding and have a great honeymoon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Michael: you bring up a very good point, which is that everyone is different in their reactions to things. I suppose the author of the book I read may have been thinking of the typical reader as being male, and figured such a reader would have an interest in a long description of a blonde woman. To me, it was offputting.

And it's true we're not all the same kind of learners. I like to grasp things quickly and move on; other people might like to linger longer. We need more flexible information sources to meet different people's needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: you bring up a very good point, which is that everyone is different in their reactions to things. I suppose the author of the book I read may have been thinking of the typical reader as being male, and figured such a reader would have an interest in a long description of a blonde woman. To me, it was offputting.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s true we&#8217;re not all the same kind of learners. I like to grasp things quickly and move on; other people might like to linger longer. We need more flexible information sources to meet different people&#8217;s needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Good post!  Having written a pair of books myself now, I've experienced first hand the issues of length - not to mention timeliness.  I think there's a real growing niche for creating booklets of shorter length, quicker turnaround, yet with professional editing and production.  Something better put together than an off-the-cuff blog, yet with a much shorter development arc.

At least, I'd like to think so, and would like to do so.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!  Having written a pair of books myself now, I&#8217;ve experienced first hand the issues of length - not to mention timeliness.  I think there&#8217;s a real growing niche for creating booklets of shorter length, quicker turnaround, yet with professional editing and production.  Something better put together than an off-the-cuff blog, yet with a much shorter development arc.</p>
<p>At least, I&#8217;d like to think so, and would like to do so.  <img src='http://www.annezelenka.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Good discussion. It reminds me of the difference perspectives on motorcycles contained in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. The author, Pirsig, had a classical view and wanted to go below the surface and understand ideas contained in the motorcycle and how they worked. His friend had a romantic (worldview) and wanted to just experience the joy of a ride and was not too concerned with maintenance of his motorcycle or the science of internal combustion engines.

Maybe readers are like that. One, just a pragmatic interest in the basics of a subject. Others readers want to dig deep and understand the details.

Neither one of them wants needless verbiage, self-indulgent or otherwise. But both have a kind of interest that causes them to respond to one kind of book/booklet over another. We're not all the same kind of learners.

And I doubt this is consistent or uniform in any one person from subject to subject.

Good posting and thanks for enlarging my thoughts and extending the conversation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion. It reminds me of the difference perspectives on motorcycles contained in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. The author, Pirsig, had a classical view and wanted to go below the surface and understand ideas contained in the motorcycle and how they worked. His friend had a romantic (worldview) and wanted to just experience the joy of a ride and was not too concerned with maintenance of his motorcycle or the science of internal combustion engines.</p>
<p>Maybe readers are like that. One, just a pragmatic interest in the basics of a subject. Others readers want to dig deep and understand the details.</p>
<p>Neither one of them wants needless verbiage, self-indulgent or otherwise. But both have a kind of interest that causes them to respond to one kind of book/booklet over another. We&#8217;re not all the same kind of learners.</p>
<p>And I doubt this is consistent or uniform in any one person from subject to subject.</p>
<p>Good posting and thanks for enlarging my thoughts and extending the conversation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Mike - you're right; booklets could interest people in longer publications.

I hadn't seen NXTbook Media before... interesting. I wonder, however, whether such products are even needed. With PDFs, everyone can publish themselves in a portable format. However, PDFs aren't optimized for work with digital book readers and there are other things you could do with something richer, like the Flash technology that NXTbooks are apparently based on.

And thanks for your comment! Perhaps you'll be tracking this somehow, based on your recent blog post covering various ways of monitoring responses to comments you've made. I personally haven't done a very good job of keeping track of comments I make on other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - you&#8217;re right; booklets could interest people in longer publications.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t seen NXTbook Media before&#8230; interesting. I wonder, however, whether such products are even needed. With PDFs, everyone can publish themselves in a portable format. However, PDFs aren&#8217;t optimized for work with digital book readers and there are other things you could do with something richer, like the Flash technology that NXTbooks are apparently based on.</p>
<p>And thanks for your comment! Perhaps you&#8217;ll be tracking this somehow, based on your recent blog post covering various ways of monitoring responses to comments you&#8217;ve made. I personally haven&#8217;t done a very good job of keeping track of comments I make on other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sansone</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sansone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/06/an-unsatisfying-read#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Books probably won't disappear completely, but there is a change that's already arrived. Booklets are a smart way to go (maybe even as a pre-publication for a larger work), as are the online versions you point out.

Have you see &lt;a href="http://www.nxtbookmedia.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;NXTbook Media&lt;/a&gt;?  That could be another solution.

Thanks for your insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Books probably won&#8217;t disappear completely, but there is a change that&#8217;s already arrived. Booklets are a smart way to go (maybe even as a pre-publication for a larger work), as are the online versions you point out.</p>
<p>Have you see <a href="http://www.nxtbookmedia.com/" rel="nofollow">NXTbook Media</a>?  That could be another solution.</p>
<p>Thanks for your insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
