Les Orchard confesses he’s a serial enthusiast, flitting from nanoproject to nanoproject. He enjoys the process more than the results. How very mindful. He says:
So what’s my point in all of this? Mostly just writing to think this notion through. I’m sure this isn’t a terribly original self-discovery, but it’s one that I wanted to admit and elaborate so that I can at least explain myself to myself and work with it. And, having said all that, I thought that there just might be some others freewheeling around out there with whom the phrase “serial enthusiast” might hold some meaning, too.
It holds meaning for me. I, too, am a serial enthusiast. There, I said it, perhaps postponing forever the day in which I return to a nine-to-five job.
Serial enthusiasts, also known as foxes, aren’t fully appreciated in our culture. We like hedgehogs, a.k.a. experts, better; in fact, we want to be them. No one has ever written a blog post titled “How to Be a Dilettante” (I checked). And yet, what would the world do without us? Some of the most interesting thinkers today–Malcom Gladwell, Steven Levitt, and Virginia Postrel, for example–are more fox than hedgehog. They draw on broad knowledge of many subjects to get at underlying patterns of meaning.
But no one’s all fox (dilettante/serial enthusiast/renaissance man or woman) or all hedgehog (expert/specialist/authority). My current obsession with mindfulness reflects a monogamous relationship more than a passing flirtation, as I’ve studied Buddhism and experimented with meditation and other mindful practices for over twenty years. I have an abiding interest in technology, specifically web technology, that will likely last as long as my body is capable of browsing the web. On the personal side, my husband and I will reach the halfway point to our silver anniversary in nine months.
What’s the secret, to keeping enduring passion alive, even if you’re a serial enthusiast? Novelty. Making things new and noticing the new, even as almost everything stays or at least seems the same. Ellen Langer, my current favorite mindfulness expert, says this about novelty-seekers:
An individual who seeks novelty perceives each situation as an opportunity to learn something new. An individual who scores high in engagement is likely to notice more details about his or her specific relationship with the environment. A novelty producing person generates new information in order to learn more about the current situation. Flexible people welcome a changing environment rather than resist it.
Let me leave that as the only suggestion I’ll offer from one serial enthusiast to another as Les embarks on a great adventure requiring extensive powers of mindfulness (read: patience and nonjudgment and attention) to keep it fresh and good. Don’t follow that tired advice: “keep it real.” Keep it new, and see the everyday novelty as passing time brings more moments to enjoy. Congratulations and best wishes, Les.

6 Comments
By keeping it new, do you mean experimenting, having an open mind? As I personally juggle a full time restaurant job. Building a business (my concierge service) and a growing interest in writing and sharing things through blogging, My mindset is moving towards quality rather than quantity.
The image of the farmer tending his fields and watching things grow is something I feel close to.
I try to get away from obsessing on short term goals and giving things time to happen instead.
Serge
Biz:
http://www.njconcierges.com
Blog:
http://www.sergetheconcierge.com
So does this allow me to feel better about not completing things!!
I am definitely always interested in getting on to the next thing, rather than thoroughly sweeping up and hitting the lights. Maybe I can just tell people that it’s my fox-nature…
Serge: I think experimenting and having an open mind are components of finding the novelty in what might seem mundane to other people. I imagine that business owners like you must find ways to keep repetitive experiences fresh and interesting, otherwise you risk treating your customers by rote instead of with attention. Your metaphor of a farmer makes me think of the virtues of patience and letting things develop in their own time.
Scott: I have that completion problem too. Somehow calling myself a fox doesn’t quiet the voices of my parents in my head saying “don’t be a quitter!”
I’ve been lucky enough to find someone who’s not only tolerant of my serial enthusiasms, but apparently enjoys being around me. And, I’ve found that in her case my enthusiasm has only been constant and growing and shows no sign of wander. Alexandra’s been a daily source of novelty to me, so I think she’s one rare case wherein I’m happy to tie up loose ends and commit to a lifetime of future support.
I’ve tried to become a disciplined fox in my life. If left to my natural instincts I
Earl: I like that, HedgeFox or FoxHog. You’re right, you can balance it. But sometimes being a little unbalanced is fun too!
3 Trackbacks
[…] Finally I know what I am: I’m a serial enthusiast. […]
[…] In Satisfaction: The Science of Finding True Fulfillment, psychiatrist and neuroscientist Gregory Berns proposes that satisfaction lies not in simple hedonism, but in feeding our brains with challenging, novel experiences. Last week, I was exploring how to maintain enduring passion when you’re a serial enthusiast. I concluded that keeping things new was the secret. In his book, Berns provides the science behind that. A sense of satisfaction is generated by the brain chemical dopamine, previously considered by scientists as the neurotransmitter of pleasure, but now known to be released in anticipation of and in response to both pleasant and unpleasant sensations. Incidentally, dopamine is released by many psychoactive drugs including my personal favorite, caffeine. […]
[…] Les Orchard calls himself a Serial Enthusiast and Anne Zelenka concurs: …I, too, am a serial enthusiast… […]