<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Flux, Or Why I Have Joined Web Worker Daily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily</link>
	<description>a blog about the connected age</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Kathy - talking about it in terms of the A-list/non A-list might obscure that this is more about being part of the conversation than about who's important and who's not. Yes, we can go build our own successful blogs and communication outlets and it doesn't have to be part of certain tech conversations. Sometimes though, the interesting conversations are facilitated by sites like techmeme and it matters whether our blog posts show up there or not and are linked by influential people or not. It's not just about being high ranking or having a big audience.

I'm all for deep-sixing the conversations about A list gatekeepers, but I want to keep talking and thinking about how we ensure that those who want to be part of the conversation and have ideas to add are encouraged and welcomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathy - talking about it in terms of the A-list/non A-list might obscure that this is more about being part of the conversation than about who&#8217;s important and who&#8217;s not. Yes, we can go build our own successful blogs and communication outlets and it doesn&#8217;t have to be part of certain tech conversations. Sometimes though, the interesting conversations are facilitated by sites like techmeme and it matters whether our blog posts show up there or not and are linked by influential people or not. It&#8217;s not just about being high ranking or having a big audience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for deep-sixing the conversations about A list gatekeepers, but I want to keep talking and thinking about how we ensure that those who want to be part of the conversation and have ideas to add are encouraged and welcomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Sierra</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-731</guid>
		<description>You don't need to link to the high-traffic folks (or have them link to you) or talk about what THEY find important in order to build an audience (and rank). It's certainly possible to have a very high page/Technorati rank one non-A-lister reader/linker at a time.

While there may be shortcuts to "popularity" or rank, and that it's possible to get readers just by being "one of the guys", it is JUST as possible to get readers by putting them first, whether you have boobs or not. And you don't need to be on any A-list radar to do it.

Thankfully, it's a big world out there, and possible--even for a tech bloger--to have thousands of smart, authentic readers, 99% of whom might assume that Doc Searls is a medical site and TechCrunch a breakfast cereal for geeks.

My opinion (and granted--I have ONLY my personal experience here so it's just that--an opinion)is that we ought to stop granting these guys way more power than they deserve--or actually have. Seriously... what would happen if all these endless conversations the non-A-listers have about the A-list/gatekeepers just dried up? We call it an echo chamber, but then we keep amplifying and boosting the signal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need to link to the high-traffic folks (or have them link to you) or talk about what THEY find important in order to build an audience (and rank). It&#8217;s certainly possible to have a very high page/Technorati rank one non-A-lister reader/linker at a time.</p>
<p>While there may be shortcuts to &#8220;popularity&#8221; or rank, and that it&#8217;s possible to get readers just by being &#8220;one of the guys&#8221;, it is JUST as possible to get readers by putting them first, whether you have boobs or not. And you don&#8217;t need to be on any A-list radar to do it.</p>
<p>Thankfully, it&#8217;s a big world out there, and possible&#8211;even for a tech bloger&#8211;to have thousands of smart, authentic readers, 99% of whom might assume that Doc Searls is a medical site and TechCrunch a breakfast cereal for geeks.</p>
<p>My opinion (and granted&#8211;I have ONLY my personal experience here so it&#8217;s just that&#8211;an opinion)is that we ought to stop granting these guys way more power than they deserve&#8211;or actually have. Seriously&#8230; what would happen if all these endless conversations the non-A-listers have about the A-list/gatekeepers just dried up? We call it an echo chamber, but then we keep amplifying and boosting the signal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael bernstein</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>michael bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Congratulations!

OPML will probably be a part of that, but I suspect that if-and-when it gains enough traction of that sort it will have to be reinvented as an actual XML format to ease all sorts of pain.

Sometimes worse isn't better. Sometimes worse is worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!</p>
<p>OPML will probably be a part of that, but I suspect that if-and-when it gains enough traction of that sort it will have to be reinvented as an actual XML format to ease all sorts of pain.</p>
<p>Sometimes worse isn&#8217;t better. Sometimes worse is worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-729</guid>
		<description>James, you're right there's got to be a better way to dip in and out of communities and OPML must be part of that. I personally am very interested in links across communities and would like to know how I could dip into one community then another and then see how they are related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you&#8217;re right there&#8217;s got to be a better way to dip in and out of communities and OPML must be part of that. I personally am very interested in links across communities and would like to know how I could dip into one community then another and then see how they are related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Ryan - the issue I've been exploring lately is that women tend to blog in a different way than men, and the way men blog is the way that techmeme grants authority to. That is, blogging about a single subject without mixing in personal topics, linking extensively to bloggers with high reputation, and blogging consistently over time. Of course that's just a generalization.

This came up in Shelley's comment threads: does one try to change society or try to change technology? Shelley suggested it might be easier to change technology. I suggested back that neither was likely to change.

In it all, I try to remember that it's not clear who has it better or worse, women or men. I have a lot of freedom as a woman that men aren't granted. I can move in and out of the workforce without people questioning it. I don't feel pressured to prove myself through my career (well, not as much as I assume men feel pressured, anyway). I can be whatever I want: venture capitalist, nurse, software developer, teacher, whereas men are dissuaded from typically female professions.

I don't know how you do pagerank without links. But one place to start looking would be amongst mommybloggers, because they don't link like tech bloggers but there are definitely ways to figure out who's influential... maybe comments, or identifying topics flowing through that community, or I don't know what.

Do Lego Mindstorms suck? I was thinking of that for my ten-year-old. I will have to search on "mindstorms universal binary"!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan - the issue I&#8217;ve been exploring lately is that women tend to blog in a different way than men, and the way men blog is the way that techmeme grants authority to. That is, blogging about a single subject without mixing in personal topics, linking extensively to bloggers with high reputation, and blogging consistently over time. Of course that&#8217;s just a generalization.</p>
<p>This came up in Shelley&#8217;s comment threads: does one try to change society or try to change technology? Shelley suggested it might be easier to change technology. I suggested back that neither was likely to change.</p>
<p>In it all, I try to remember that it&#8217;s not clear who has it better or worse, women or men. I have a lot of freedom as a woman that men aren&#8217;t granted. I can move in and out of the workforce without people questioning it. I don&#8217;t feel pressured to prove myself through my career (well, not as much as I assume men feel pressured, anyway). I can be whatever I want: venture capitalist, nurse, software developer, teacher, whereas men are dissuaded from typically female professions.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how you do pagerank without links. But one place to start looking would be amongst mommybloggers, because they don&#8217;t link like tech bloggers but there are definitely ways to figure out who&#8217;s influential&#8230; maybe comments, or identifying topics flowing through that community, or I don&#8217;t know what.</p>
<p>Do Lego Mindstorms suck? I was thinking of that for my ten-year-old. I will have to search on &#8220;mindstorms universal binary&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-727</guid>
		<description>Mathew: oops, sorry, my mistake! Glad to know you're subscribed, however you get here is fine by me  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew: oops, sorry, my mistake! Glad to know you&#8217;re subscribed, however you get here is fine by me  <img src='http://www.annezelenka.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-726</guid>
		<description>coolness. i have been wondering about a related concept i am loosely thinking about as community grazing or community dipping. our feed subscriptions are of course very loosely coupled and we will dip in and out of different communities and knowledge centers as we work on differnt things. I am pretty sure OPML has a role here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coolness. i have been wondering about a related concept i am loosely thinking about as community grazing or community dipping. our feed subscriptions are of course very loosely coupled and we will dip in and out of different communities and knowledge centers as we work on differnt things. I am pretty sure OPML has a role here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amyloo</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Amyloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-725</guid>
		<description>That's great news, Anne. Nice to see your thoughtful writing recognized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great news, Anne. Nice to see your thoughtful writing recognized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Actually, Anne, I'm pretty sure I found it through my feed reader rather than Techmeme, since I'm subscribed to your feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Anne, I&#8217;m pretty sure I found it through my feed reader rather than Techmeme, since I&#8217;m subscribed to your feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.annezelenka.com/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annezelenka.com/testbed/2006/11/blog-flux-or-why-i-have-joined-web-worker-daily#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Hey I think it's a great opportunity. Best of luck to you and I'll be looking for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I think it&#8217;s a great opportunity. Best of luck to you and I&#8217;ll be looking for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
