Are Women More Likely to Say No to Conference Invitations?

Stowe Boyd on Kottke on gender diversity at conferences:

Gack. I am working with the CMP folks on Enterprise 2.0, and so far I have asked one person, a woman, if she could participate, and I was turned down.

Others have made the case that many of the most interesting woman for tech conference speaking roles have a higher turn-down rate than their male counterparts. I wonder if that is just an urban legend. Nonetheless, I am going to continue to dig into this issue, since it seems to never go away.

That woman was me. Thanks for the invitation, Stowe. I turned it down because right before that conference I’ll be in Hawaii for a wedding. I guess I could fly from Kona to Denver and then immediately get on a plane to Boston. If I were a man, would I? Maybe. I don’t know. If I were a man, I might feel less ambivalent about my brilliant career in technology. If I were a man, I might not be made to feel like a freak of nature because I’m a woman who likes tech.

This week I was invited to be on a conference board. I said no again. I don’t have a schedule conflict. I could do it. But the calculus of work for me is necessarily different than the calculus of work for many men. Here are a few reasons why:

  • I have three kids. They’re all in school from 8:30 am to 3 pm, but anyone with kids knows that’s a nominal schedule not anything to be counted on. For example, this week they’re out of school for spring break. I do have an au pair on the way, so I’ll be available for more work. But for now, I’m the childcare giver of first and last resort in my family.
  • Being successful careerwise is not something that is unreservedly celebrated in women. We grow up learning that to be feminine and to be powerful are mutually exclusive. Men don’t suffer from this conflict — to be powerful and to be masculine and to be a leader are all consistent. It still stings when I remember back to when a coworker of mine at Oracle confessed to me how offputting he found my “aggressiveness” when I started there. I was just being myself and being mostly successful… but it was at odds with my gender.
  • Visibility online has more drawbacks for women than for men. Men get death threats too but they aren’t subject to the same level of vitriol and sexual harassment that women face. Whether it’s rational or not, I worry about being stalked. I don’t think men worry about that. I made my Twitterstream private because I felt fear about people watching me that I don’t know.
  • Working in male-dominated environments (e.g., most tech conferences) is personally exhausting to me, setting aside the extra work and travel it involves.

I’m getting to the point in my life where I’m not interested in compromising what I need and what I want and what feels comfortable to me just because the people in power say I should want and need something different. I don’t particularly like conferences, don’t want to travel away from the kids, don’t want the discomfort of dealing with so many masters of the universe at one time.

Another way to look at it is from a resource perspective. Men are generally paid more (especially if you look at compensation over the lifetime), have more time to themselves (given women’s disproportionate share of the caregiving burden for our youngest and eldest relatives), and have more imputed expertise to draw upon (because women are generally considered less competent than men, given the same qualifications). Going to a conference requires resources that sometimes I don’t feel like I can spare.

To bring a balancing perspective though: as a woman, I have a different set of opportunities and payoffs than men. Different, not worse. I easily took five years off from the workforce and no one questioned me. Most men would have to justify themselves again and again to do that. I can mix the personal and professional on my blog more easily than a man can, because it’s more acceptedly female to do so. I can own my weaknesses instead of pretending they don’t exist.

I don’t know that you’ll see me at any more conferences this year. Here’s what I’m looking forward to: continuing to nurture Web Worker Daily to its full potential, visiting Volcano National Park on the Big Island in June, making our now-annual trek to Estes Park/Rocky Mountain National Park in July when I’ll look for lakes instead of climbing mountains, writing a book, welcoming and making our Paraguayan au pair feel at home, taking up painting again, learning to play guitar like that guy from the Foo Fighters, and cherishing people like Stowe who inspire and stretch me, even if they might shake their heads at how I live my life and pursue my career.

5 Comments

  1. Posted March 28, 2007 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    It’s a bit of a shame that you still have to defend your choices, isn’t it? But I know why I’D like you (that’s the collective female ‘you’ that Stowe and Kottke refer to, not just Anne Z) to attend more conferences - because in the main you’re all pretty smart, and I like dealing with smart people, AND you bring a different perspective. Of course, I’m not likely to be at too many of those conferences either, but the principle applies equally here in Australia - I know plenty of smart women whose input I miss if it isn’t there.

    Maybe Stowe, Kottke and I are just jealous that you think your kids are more important than us :-)

  2. Posted March 28, 2007 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    I’m finding how hard it is to be a woman in tech myself, struggling to figure out the logistics of a cross-country meeting with a potential business partner, which wouldn’t be an issue except that I am also exclusively nursing an 8-month-old and refuse to compromise his health and well-being (or mine) just for the good of our web company. But every time I ask for some accomodation of my nursing needs, I feel like I am putting us in a worse and worse tactital situation and that I won’t even remotely be taken seriously when I get SFO in a week an a half. Although the fact that they’re willing to accomodate me, the baby, and the nanny at all tells me that they’re pretty serious about our business, so I guess I should take heart.

    Webworking really puts the blinders on sometimes; you go about your professional life online and multitask taking care of your customers and your kids in one fell swoop without realizing how truly lucky you are and how many problems are out there when you have to navigate in a male-dominated brick and mortar world.

    I hope you and I both can get back to painting this year; it’s the whole reason I became a webworker in the first place before the children intervened.

  3. Posted March 28, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Your post really resonates with me, Anne. This has been a huge issue for me as well, particularly since I had kids. (I should say, I have only recently begun working in IT; before that I was working in a different branch of engineering, and writing fiction. But conditions were similar — though not identical — there. IT is actually much worse, in terms of gender imbalance.)

  4. JB
    Posted March 29, 2007 at 5:54 am | Permalink

    I don’t care if you are a woman or not, I’m just glad to see someone else who values more than just work. I’m tired of meeting people who think if you aren’t living in Twitter you are nothing. Its nice to see that other people in this industry like to disconnect themselves from it for a while. I’m constantly fighting with people at work who don’t understand that at the end of the day I want to go him and follow other pursuits (especially now that it is baseball season) rather than continue writing software all night. Some days I’m so sick of it I can’t even look at my computer when I get home.

    Keep up the good work, I definitely enjoy reading your site.

  5. Posted March 29, 2007 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    I specifically don’t attend any event in person because of the imposition on my family. If the speaker can’t make their message clear in a 1000 word essay on a web site, I don’t think my traveling 30 or 3000 miles will make their delivery more effective.

    A lot of people measure success by how many people attend their events and by how much they pay. I don’t believe that this sort of measure is valuable.

    I also think that attending conferences and other such events are sort of mini vacations for people who think they are too busy to take vacations. When I go on vacation, I leave my cell phone at home and don’t turn on any computer. That’s a real vacation. Otherwise, I am much more effective at my desk. Conferences are inefficient for me: not a real vacation, not real work.

    Oh, and about women and fear of violence, as someone pointed out elsewhere on the web: the bigger size advantage is nil when guns are involved, so I do feel the same “apprehension” going somewhere I think might not be entirely safe.

One Trackback

  1. [...] Anne Zelenka’s: Are Women More Likely to Say No to Conference Invitations? [...]

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated. Rude comments may be edited or deleted.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*